When
looking into the forces driving behind the leading of great states, the role of
sovereignty cannot be overlooked. Although government and politics have changed
a lot over the last few hundred years, many aspects have not. Although the idea
of sovereignty with absolute rule and power isn’t as popular or smart as it
used to be, some concepts are still prevalent today. Now, however, states must
be even more cautious when it comes to matters with sovereignty. For example,
foreign intervention to help an ally or defeat an enemy has many other
consequences between military strength and power. When deciding upon
international affairs today, just as importantly are economic effects.
The concept and
power of sovereignty in our world is almost unparalleled by any other force
when it comes to states and leaders’ decision-making. After reading Morgenthau’s piece about how
states operate with sovereignty and under self-help system, I can’t help but
think about the same rules and practices that follow the same methods in our
society. Eventually, I came to the conclusion of the possibility that
sovereignty occurs naturally in humans, and that each one of us is wired to the
self-help system of living.
The
first comparison that came to mind was the quintessential school playground
where the older kids or bullies operate as great states, and the smaller
younger kids act as less powerful states. In this system, Morgenthau makes it clear
that, “it pays to be selfish in a self-help world.” Therefore, states, or in
the real life example of the playground, each child looks after their own
self-interest. As great states, the bullies do as they please to the weaker,
defenseless kids. However, when it comes to conflict between bullies, it is
clear that they fear each other for they do not know the capabilities of one
another. Because they all hold power over others, they observe each other with
suspicion. As Morgenthau states, “They anticipate danger. There is little room
for trust among states.” Just like in the playground, the only way for smaller
states to defeat larger ones is through clever strategies. This could involve
gaining power slowly with small vectoring, or possibly by joining forces with
another smaller power.
This way of thinking has led
me to a new idea as well. Does the idea of sovereignty and the self-help system
occur naturally? In other words, do these ideas fall under the natural law
category of mankind? Overall, we’d have to consider a lot of factors. Although
it is true that many people act to help others, but much more often than not,
people act in pursuit of their own self-interest. But, does this dictate every
social and political situation worldwide? I personally believe that sovereignty
reigns in many different aspects of society, on both large and small scales,
not just in politics. In addition to the playground example, the same model
applies in high school and. the workplace. However, it is also key to examine
whether or not the small-scale scenarios in which the self help system exists
actually contributes to how government is operated. If this is true, the
possibility of the self-help system and personal sovereignty could actually be
a part of natural law.
What I liked about this post was the examples given of sovereignty in everyday life. The playground example was one that resonated with me. It related to everyone acting in their own self interest in order to improve their own situations. There will always be the "bigger" states and the "smaller" ones, and the smaller ones need to be methodical and clever in order to grow. They shouldn't focus on overtaking the bigger states, but rather focus on improving themselves.
ReplyDeleteWhile people are compassionate and generous in various areas of life, it ultimately boils down to the self help system Mark talks about in his post. I agree with Mark when he says "people act in pursuit of their own self-interest." People are always looking to improve their individual situations and to get a leg up on their peers. I agree with Mark's ideas relating to Sovereignty and the self help system, and the examples given really strengthen his arguments.
I enjoyed how mark drew a comparison between IR and children on a playground. It simplified the problem to a very basic point. Basic actors look out for themselves, as a person or a state.This led me to ask the question, when these children grow up, won't they act in the same self-interest? I believe yes, there a people that are selfishly out for themselves. However i do believe with age comes wisdom and more unshelfeness.
ReplyDeleteHowever because a state does not have the same "lifespan" of a person. I think there is a disconnect between a state giving up power and becoming more unselfish and a person doing the same thing. I think mark, knowingly or not, drew a comparison between realism and liberalism in a way. By everyone looking out for their own interest, everyone fights for power.
I found this piece very interesting. I enjoyed the examples that tied the idea of sovereignty together.
ReplyDeleteI can see that realism is coming out of Mark's argument. His playground example illustrated an aspect of realism: power. Since the bullies are bigger and meaner, they have a type of power that enables them to claim the playground as their own. And in many ways, I agree that man is somehow wired to a self-help system. Hobbes claims that man, in the state of nature, is the most vulnerable since there is no safety present. Hence the state of nature is the same as the state of war since it is man's inherent need to survive.
Mark brings out the idea that in order to gain some place in the playground, the smaller kids need to be clever and defeat the bullies. However, in reality, I believe that it takes more than being clever. Being clever is necessary. But having allies that will help a smaller state will also allow the smaller one's to defeat the larger states. Hence, I do not think that government's rely on the self-help system because if they did, then lesser states would not exist. In our present day, states rely on each other to maintain sovereignty.